This is something that’s bothered me for years and years and I want to explore it here so I can jot down ideas without feeling pressured to formulate a neat and tidy essay for this.
1. Why is there such pressure on adopted people to “find [their] birth parents”, even when that thought has never crossed the adoptees’ minds? Why must one set of parents (the adopted parents) not suffice? We’re more than happy to have biological children have only the one set of parents. Why must we create an “othered” situation here?
2. By insisting on there being two distinct sets of parents instead of one “real” set (the adopted parents who raised the adoptee and who are the real parents in this situation) and another set who are essentially nothing more than biologically tied strangers. Would we pressure everyone to accept a set of virtual strangers as “parents” regardless of how they feel about it? No. Then why do so for adoptees?
3. Adoptees are constantly told they’re incomplete unless they know anything and everything about their “biological parents”. They must go and seek and find. They are rarely allowed to accept that they have only one family — their adoptive family — even if said family is highly dysfunctional. Biological families can be and frequently are highly dysfunctional too, but we only encourage the children in that situation to welcome friends into their lives as a surrogate family. Why can’t we say the same toward adoptees?
4. Whenever someone talks about wanting to have a child, it’s invariably tied toward biologically siring/producing a baby. If one cannot do so naturally, one is encouraged to explore alternate avenues of siring/producing a baby. Every time adoption is brought up as an alternative, there’s this chorus of people saying that said suggestion is offensive, that adoption is impossible, that it’s not a sufficient replacement for biologically siring/producing a baby, etc. Every time those comments are uttered, it wounds an adoptee who feels as though they themselves are being rejected as being “inferior” by those very same people, who comprise the majority of people out there.
5. Invariably when adoption is offered as an option, people’s minds automatically think either toward adoption through foster care or international adoptions. Little thought is put forth toward private, domestic adoptions. This also makes the adoptee from a private, domestic adoption process feel inferior and “unwanted”.
6. Laws need to change to make it easier on those people who wish to adopt via private, domestic channels. There need to be more closed adoptions of the kind that traditionally took place over 30 years ago. Women who give up a baby through that system should be encouraged to do so but should also be encouraged not to rethink the process or to insist on hand-picking the couple or making it an “open” process. By hand-picking the couple over a set of personally defined parameters, we turn the adoption process into a game show or popularity contest minus the studio audience, cameras, high school corridors, or lunchrooms. By making it an “open” process, that too “others” the adoptee by forcing him or her to live in a nontraditional environment where they can’t simply have the one set of parents.
And yes, I know that there are plenty of households these days with children who have two sets of parents from divorce (including one set of parents and one set of stepparents), but this is from a completely different process. If an adoptee is to have two sets of parents, (s)he should have them via divorce as well, where both couples include one of the child’s original parents and a stepparent from the secondary marriage. This should be the only acceptable way of any child, biological or adopted, to have two sets of parents, as having it any other way leads to an “othering” of adopted children.
7. Why should we be concerned with this “othering” of adopted children? Because it creates a special situation that indicates that the adoptees aren’t to be treated as normal individuals but as “others”, saddled with special situations, condescending attitudes, and a sense of living life as one unwanted by the mainstream. An adopted child should feel no different, no less or more “special”, than any other child out there, and should be allowed to have as uncomplicated an upbringing as possible.
I forgot where I was going up there after typing out “no less or more ‘special’ than any other child out there”, so I’ll leave this be. These are just random thoughts and ideas that have come into my head after reading numerous discussions online from various sources.